State v. Davis

Appellant has presented seven propositions of law.

I

First, appellant contends that the trial court erred in *54not sustaining a defense motion to suppress certain statements made by appellant to the police on February 25-26, 1976, which appellant claims were not made pursuant to a knowing, voluntary and intelligent waiver of his constitutional privilege againt self-incrimination.

Both appellant and his mother signed Miranda rights waiver forms before each of three questioning sessions on February 25 and 26. Appellant was not under arrest. There has been no contention of police abuse or coercion,…