Legal Opinion

State v. Jones

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 2000No. Nos. 99-613 and 99-769PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.

The issue certified for our -review is whether “an arrest in violation of R.C. 2935.26 constitute^] an unreasonable seizure under the Fourth *434Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article I, Section 14 of the Ohio Constitution, thereby requiring suppression [in accordance with the exclusionary rule] of evidence seized as a consequence of the violation of that statute.” For the reasons that follow, we answer the certified issue in the affirmative and affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.

The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, made applicable to the states…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  5. Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. State v. Adams (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2015
  2. State v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 2015
  4. State v. WeidemanOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State v. JenkinsOhio Court of Appeals · 2010

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API