Legal Opinion

State v. Wilmoth

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 1986No. Nos. 85-72 and 85-73PublishedCited by 99 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPatton, J.

In their single proposition of law, appellants contend that a search warrant issued on the basis of unsworn oral statements of police officers is defective and requires suppression of any evidence obtained therefrom. This contention is without merit.

The United States Supreme Court has recently modified the exclusionary rule in United States v. Leon (1984), 468 U.S__, 82 L. Ed. 2d 677. In that case, the court held that the exclusionary rule should not be applied to suppress evidence obtained by police officers acting in objectively reasonable, good faith reliance on a search warrant issued by…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Stone v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by99 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. EdmundsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. State v. GeorgeOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State v. MarsalaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  4. State v. ClineSupreme Court of Iowa · 2000
  5. State v. GutierrezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993

94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API