Legal Opinion

In re C.S.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 2007No. 2006-1074PublishedCited by 103 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connor, J.

{¶ 1} Forty years after the Supreme Court’s watershed ruling in In re Gault (1967), 387 U.S. 1, 87 S.Ct. 1428, 18 L.Ed.2d 527, we address important questions concerning the scope of a juvenile’s right to counsel in a delinquency proceeding and the waiver of that right. We hold that the juvenile’s right to counsel is a right that he may waive, subject to certain conditions.

Relevant Background

{¶ 2} Appellant, C.S., was brought before the Juvenile Division of the Licking County Court of Common Pleas on August 9, 2005. At that time, he was almost 14 years old.

A. The Incidents

{¶ 3} C.S.’s…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by103 opinions

  1. State v. SarkozyOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State v. SimpkinsOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. BloomerOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  4. State v. GardnerOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State v. Aalim (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017

98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API