In re C.S.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connor, J.
{¶ 1} Forty years after the Supreme Court’s watershed ruling in In re Gault (1967), 387 U.S. 1, 87 S.Ct. 1428, 18 L.Ed.2d 527, we address important questions concerning the scope of a juvenile’s right to counsel in a delinquency proceeding and the waiver of that right. We hold that the juvenile’s right to counsel is a right that he may waive, subject to certain conditions.
Relevant Background
{¶ 2} Appellant, C.S., was brought before the Juvenile Division of the Licking County Court of Common Pleas on August 9, 2005. At that time, he was almost 14 years old.
A. The Incidents
{¶ 3} C.S.’s…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by103 opinions
- State v. SarkozyOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. SimpkinsOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. BloomerOhio Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. GardnerOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. Aalim (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.