Legal Opinion
Cohen v. DirecTV, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 28, 2009No. B204986PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BIGELOW, J.
A subscriber to services delivered by a satellite television company filed a class action complaint alleging the company had disseminated false advertising to induce him and other subscribers to purchase more expensive “high definition” or “HD” services. On a prior appeal, we affirmed
the trial court’s order denying the company’s motion to compel arbitration of the subscribers’ class action claims. (See Cohen v. DIRECTV, Inc. (2006) 142 Cal.App.4th 1442 [48 Cal.Rptr.3d 813] (Cohen I).) In the appeal before us today, the subscribers challenge the trial court’s subsequent order…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- In Re Tobacco II CasesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- Vasquez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Daar v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1967
- Wash. Mut. Bank v. Superior Court of Orange Cty.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Lozano v. AT & T Wireless Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Mazza v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Margie Daniel v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Avritt v. Reliastar Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- Steroid Hormone Product CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Chavez v. Blue Sky Natural Beverage Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2010
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.