State v. McCormick
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.
Defendant petitions for reconsideration of our decision affirming his conviction and sentence for criminally negligent homicide. State v. McCormick, 184 Or App 455, 56 P3d 482 (2002). Among other things, he challenges our decision not to review the imposition of a sentence of five years’ imprisonment with three years of post-prison supervision, which he contends violates ORS 161.605 and was plain error that is reviewable notwithstanding his failure to raise the issue at trial.
The state responds that, in State v. Layton, 163 Or App 37, 41, 986 P2d 1221 (1999), rev den, 330 Or 252 (2000), we…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. JuryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- State v. LaytonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- Layton v. HallCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- State v. McCormickCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. WiersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
- State v. HollinquestCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
- State v. HymanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- State v. MunionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005