Legal Opinion

State v. Hyman

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 25, 2009No. C072268CR; A137971PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction for felon in possession of a firearm, ORS 166.270(1), and possession of methamphetamine, ORS 475.894. He argues that the trial court erred in (1) denying his motion for a judgment of acquittal on the felon in possession of a firearm count; and (2) imposing a 42-month term of incarceration followed by a 36-month term of post-prison supervision on that count in violation of OAR 213-005-0002(4), which provides that “[t]he term of post-prison supervision, when added to the prison term, shall not exceed the statutory maximum indeterminate sentence…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. WiersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  2. State v. McCormickCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  3. State v. StankewitzCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. CalhounCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API