Legal Opinion

State v. McCormick

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 23, 2002No. 98-08-36801; A109115PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.

Defendant was charged with murder and convicted of the lesser-included offense of criminally negligent homicide. On appeal, he contends that the trial court erred in instructing the jury on the lesser-included offense. He also contends that the trial court erred in excluding evidence of the victim’s prior bad acts and in imposing a sentence that exceeds the statutory maximum. We affirm.

We begin with the contention that the trial court should not have given the instruction on the lesser-included offense, stating the facts in the light most favorable to the party seeking the instruction, that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. IsomOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. NaylorOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  3. State v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  4. State v. GoldsberryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. McCormickCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  2. State v. MunionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API