Legal Opinion

State v. Hollinquest

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 2, 2007No. 001239972, 020533136; A120498, A120499PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Defendant was convicted of first-degree manslaughter, ORS 163.118, and felon in possession of a firearm, ORS 166.270. On appeal, defendant makes two arguments concerning the sentence he received on the manslaughter conviction, and, in a pro se supplemental brief, challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the manslaughter conviction.1 We reject without discussion the challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence. Regarding the sentencing issues, we need only reach one of those issues, because we conclude that an error apparent on the face of the record entitles defendant to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. McCormickCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  2. State v. TracyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. HOLLINGQUESTCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API