Legal Opinion

Association of Commonwealth v. Moylan

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1994No. S-92-835PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.

Association of Commonwealth Claimants appeals from the order of the district court sustaining appellees’ demurrer and dismissing appellant’s action. The district court held that appellant’s action was barred by the 4-year statute of limitations set forth in Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-207(3) and (4) (Reissue 1989). We affirm.

This is one of several cases related to the failure of Commonwealth Savings Company (Commonwealth). See, Haman v. Marsh, 237 Neb. 699, 467 N.W.2d 836 (1991); Weimer v. Amen, 235 Neb. 287, 455 N.W.2d 145 (1990); Association of Commonwealth Claimants v. Hake, 2 Neb. App. 123, 507…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Hoiengs v. County of AdamsNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Haman v. MarshNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  3. League v. VaniceNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Murphy v. Spelts-Schultz Lumber Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  5. DeVaux v. DeVauxNebraska Supreme Court · 1994

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Strassburg v. Citizens State BankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Giese v. SticeNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Gordon v. ConnellNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Zion Wheel Baptist Church v. HerzogNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Hoeft v. Five Points BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1995

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API