Legal Opinion

Gordon v. Connell

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1996No. S-94-419PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnolly, J.

Leon D. Gordon filed a professional negligence action against Dr. Evan Connell, a dentist. Gordon alleged that Connell negligently administered novocaine while performing a dental procedure, thereby injuring his facial and jaw muscles. The district court granted Connell’s motion for summary judgment, finding that Gordon’s action was barred by the statute of limitations. We affirm.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

In My 1990, while an inmate at the Douglas County Correctional Center in Omaha, Nebraska, Gordon was evaluated by Connell for complaints related to an abscessed tooth on the lower right side of his…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Lindsay Manufacturing Co. v. Universal Surety Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Healy v. LangdonNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Central States Resources, Corp. v. First National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Seevers v. PotterNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  5. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Touche Ross & Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Reinke Manufacturing Co. v. HayesNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Giese v. SticeNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Alston v. Hormel Foods Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Pennfield Oil Company v. WinstromNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Carruth v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 2006

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API