Legal Opinion

United States v. Anderson

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided August 3, 1962No. 15,883PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

Quinn, Chief Judge:

Among other offenses, the accused was convicted by a general court-martial of sodomy, in violation of Article 125, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 925 (Charge II). He contends the conviction must be reversed because the law officer’s instructions were insufficient to apprise the court-martial of the effect of his testimony that he was asleep when the alleged act was performed.

After some drinking at a local bar, the accused went to Specialist Hutch-ins’ room. Hutchins testified the accused forced him to commit the offense. In a written pretrial…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. JohnsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
  2. United States v. AcfalleUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1961
  3. United States v. LandrumUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  4. United States v. JohnsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. DearingCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006
  2. United States v. RiegeU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1978
  3. United States v. HarveyUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2008
  4. United States v. AskewUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1963
  5. United States v. DearingCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API