United States v. Anderson
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
Quinn, Chief Judge:
Among other offenses, the accused was convicted by a general court-martial of sodomy, in violation of Article 125, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 925 (Charge II). He contends the conviction must be reversed because the law officer’s instructions were insufficient to apprise the court-martial of the effect of his testimony that he was asleep when the alleged act was performed.
After some drinking at a local bar, the accused went to Specialist Hutch-ins’ room. Hutchins testified the accused forced him to commit the offense. In a written pretrial…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. JohnsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
- United States v. AcfalleUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1961
- United States v. LandrumUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
- United States v. JohnsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. DearingCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006
- United States v. RiegeU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1978
- United States v. HarveyUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2008
- United States v. AskewUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1963
- United States v. DearingCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.