United States v. Johnson
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
ROBERT E. Quinn, Chief Judge:
This is an appeal from a conviction for indecent acts, in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 934. The question before us is the legal sufficiency of the law officer’s instructions.
D. T. Erdman, an eighteen-year-old apprentice seaman, occupied a lower bunk in the S-3 Division of the U.S.S. Hancock. The accused had the adjoining bunk in the next tier. The two beds were separated by a distance of about 3i inches. In the early morning hours of Monday, June 6, 1955, Erdman was awakened by certain indecent movements…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- United States v. OlveraUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
- People v. CostonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. RiegeU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1978
- United States v. AndersonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1962
- United States v. HarveyUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2008