Legal Opinion

United States v. Johnson

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided January 11, 1957No. 8497PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

ROBERT E. Quinn, Chief Judge:

This is an appeal from a conviction for indecent acts, in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 934. The question before us is the legal sufficiency of the law officer’s instructions.

D. T. Erdman, an eighteen-year-old apprentice seaman, occupied a lower bunk in the S-3 Division of the U.S.S. Hancock. The accused had the adjoining bunk in the next tier. The two beds were separated by a distance of about 3i inches. In the early morning hours of Monday, June 6, 1955, Erdman was awakened by certain indecent movements…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. OlveraUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  2. People v. CostonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. RiegeU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1978
  2. United States v. AndersonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1962
  3. United States v. HarveyUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API