Legal Opinion

Banaitis v. Mitsubishi Bank, Ltd.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 3, 1994No. A8912-07357; CA A70113PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.

Defendants appeal from a judgment awarding plaintiff compensatory damages on his claim for wrongful discharge against defendant the Bank of California, N.A. (BanCal), and on his claim for interference with a contractual relationship against defendant Mitsubishi Bank, Ltd. (MBL). Plaintiff cross-appeals a judgment notwithstanding the verdict that deprived him of a jury award of punitive damages against both defendants. We affirm on the appeal and reverse on the cross-appeal.

We state the facts in the light most favorable to plaintiff. Plaintiff, a former vice president of BanCal, began working…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Honda Motor Co. v. ObergSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Nees v. HocksOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  3. State v. HitzOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Burrows v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Brown v. J. C. Penney Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1984

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Babick v. Oregon Arena Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Yeager v. Providence Health System OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  3. Meyer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  4. Anderson v. Evergreen International Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  5. Dunwoody v. Handskill Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2003

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API