Legal Opinion

Meyer v. State

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 5, 2018No. A159376PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShorr, J.

*649Plaintiffs, Sarah Meyer and Martin Wooldridge, appeal from a general judgment dismissing their action against defendants Oregon State Lottery (the Lottery), Jill Goldsmith, Larry Niswender, Tessa Sugahara, John Kroger, and Craig Durbin.1 Plaintiffs *94assert five assignments of error. We reject plaintiffs' fourth assignment of error without written discussion and write only to address their remaining assignments. First, plaintiffs assign error to the trial court's dismissal of their 42 USC section 1983 claims for failure to state a claim. Second, plaintiffs assign error to the trial court's…

2Cases cited69 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Connick v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2011

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Summerfield v. OLCCOregon Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Boyd v. Legacy HealthCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  3. Moodenbaugh v. OSPCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  4. Moodenbaugh v. OSPCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  5. Service Employees Int'l Union Local 503 v. U of OCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API