Legal Opinion

Dunwoody v. Handskill Corp.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 8, 2003No. 9908-08919; A112093PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLinder, J.

Plaintiff, a contractual employee, allegedly was fired for missing work in order to assist the state in the prosecution of her husband’s murderers. She brought this action against her employer for common-law wrongful discharge and intentional infliction of emotional distress. The trial court concluded that a contractual employee who may be terminated only for just cause may not bring an action for wrongful discharge. Based on that conclusion, the trial court dismissed plaintiffs claim for wrongful discharge. We disagree with the trial court’s legal conclusion and hold that a person may bring…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Blair v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. Blackmer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Nees v. HocksOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  4. McGanty v. StaudenrausOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Holien v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1984

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Keveney v. Missouri Military AcademySupreme Court of Missouri · 2010
  2. Danny v. Laidlaw Transit Services, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Yeager v. Providence Health System OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  4. Olsen v. Deschutes CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  5. Love v. Polk County Fire DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API