State Farm Fire & Casualty v. Aquila Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PORITSKY, Judge.*
Appellants, owners and insurers of property damaged by the explosion of a natural-gas pipeline, brought suit against respondents, one of which is the owner of the pipeline, and the other is the firm that installed it. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of respondents on the ground that appellants’ suits were barred by Minn.Stat. § 541.051 (2004), the statute of repose for improvements to real property. Appellants contend that the district court erred (1) in determining that the natural-gas pipeline at issue constituted an “improvement to real…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Thompson-Yaeger, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Hodder v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Benigni v. County of St. LouisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State Farm Fire & Casualty v. Aquila Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- State Farm Fire & Casualty v. Aquila Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005