Legal Opinion

Geo. S. Bush & Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided June 11, 1952No. C. D. 1429PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rao, Judge:

The collector of customs at the port of Seattle, Wash., had before him for classification four so-called Model F gasoline-driven power saws, which were imported in a knocked-down condition, together with an assortment of repair and replacement parts for various other Model F power saws. His determination that the merchandise in question consisted of machines, not specially provided for, and parts thereof, resulted in the assessment of duty at the rate of 27% per centum ad valorem pursuant to the provisions of paragraph 372 of the Tariff Act of 1930.

Two separate protests, which were…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Altman & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  2. United States v. Kalter Mercantile Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1923
  3. Columbia Shipbuilding Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1922
  4. Richardson Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1917
  5. Sheldon v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Border Brokerage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  2. Carroll v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API