Border Brokerage Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
FoRd, Judge:
The merchandise involved in these three protests, •consolidated for purposes of trial, consists of power chain saws powered by gasoline engines, which were imported as units and classified as machines, not specially provided for, under paragraph 372 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by T.D. 54108.
Plaintiffs claim the power units used with the chain saws should be constructively segregated and classified as internal-combustion engines of the carburetor type under paragraph 372 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by T.D. 52739. Plaintiffs also claim certain engine…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Columbia Shipbuilding Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1922
- Geo. S. Bush & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
- Standard Fruit & Steamship Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1946
3Cited by4 opinions
- Miller v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
- Wayne Withrow v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
- Henry Mast Greenhouses, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1995
- Border Brokerage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971