Legal Opinion

State v. Divito

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 25, 1998No. TC95-12218; CA A90618PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*674EDMONDS, J.

Defendant is charged with driving while under the influence of intoxicants (DUII) under ORS 813.010. The state appeals a pretrial ruling that excluded testimony by a state witness, as a sanction for a purported discovery violation. We reverse and remand.

This prosecution arose out of an automobile accident. Defendant’s theory of the case is that she was not the driver of the car that was involved in the accident. On the morning of trial, the prosecutor told the court in a pretrial hearing that, in preparing for trial the night before, she had discovered new evidence in the case. She…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. FosterOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  2. State v. BurdgeOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State v. WarrenOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State v. DysonOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  5. State v. BrayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. DivitoOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. DivitoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  3. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  4. State v. DivitoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  5. State v. DivitoOregon Supreme Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API