Legal Opinion

State v. Burdge

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 1983No. TC 81-1520, CA A24751, SC 29283PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.

This case involves two issues.

First, we consider the propriety of a trial judge’s refusal to allow a defense witness to testify because the defense failed to disclose the name of the witness prior to trial allegedly in violation of reciprocal discovery statutes.

Second, we consider the propriety of the trial judge’s refusal to allow a witness’s testimony because of violation of a stipulated agreement between the attorneys to exclude witnesses and the application of OEC 615 to this case.

We hold that exclusion of the witness’s testimony was reversible error.

FACTS

In this case, an undercover…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Geders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Berger v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Holder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. State v. RogersOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. JordanTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State v. TitusOregon Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State v. BurkeSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1987
  5. Webb v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API