Legal Opinion

State v. Divito

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 2000No. CC TC95-12218; CA A90618; SC S45761Published

1Opinion of the Court

5 P.3d 1103 (2000)

330 Or. 319

STATE of Oregon, Respondent on Review,

v.

Claudia DIVITO, Petitioner on Review.

(CC TC95-12218; CA A90618; SC S45761)

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted September 10, 1999.

Decided May 12, 2000.

John Henry Hingson III, Oregon City, argued the cause and filed the petition for petitioner on review.

Kaye McDonald, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent on review. With her on the brief on the merits were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Michael D. Reynolds, Solicitor General.

Before CARSON, Chief Justice, GILLETTE, VAN HOOMISSEN, and…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. WarrenOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State v. DivitoOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State v. DivitoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API