Legal Opinion
State v. Divito
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided May 12, 2000No. CC TC95-12218; CA A90618; SC S45761PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*321VAN HOOMISSEN, J.
In this criminal case, the court is asked to construe ORS 135.815 (1997), which provides, in part:
“Except as otherwise provided in ORS 135.855 and 135.873, the district attorney shall disclose to the defendant the following material and information within the possession or control of the district attorney:
“(1) The names and addresses of persons whom the district attorney intends to call as witnesses at any stage of the trial, together with their relevant written or recorded statements or memoranda of any oral statements of such persons.”1
Defendant was charged with driving…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. WarrenOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. DivitoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. WixomCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- State v. WestCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- State v. DivitoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
- State v. DivitoOregon Supreme Court · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.