Legal Opinion

State v. Divito

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 25, 1998No. TC95-12218; CA A90618Published

1Opinion of the Court

955 P.2d 327 (1998)

152 Or. App. 672

STATE of Oregon, Appellant,

v.

Claudia DIVITO, Respondent.

TC95-12218; CA A90618.

Court of Appeals of Oregon, In Banc.[*]

Argued and Submitted November 18, 1996.

Resubmitted January 13, 1998.

Decided February 25, 1998.

Kaye E. Sunderland, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for appellant. With her on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.

John Henry Hingson III, Oregon City, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent.

Resubmitted In Banc January 13, 1998.

EDMONDS, Judge.

Defendant is charged…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Perez v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  4. McIntire v. ForbesOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. MaiOregon Supreme Court · 1982

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API