Legal Opinion
Thomas v. Clayton Piano Co.
Utah Supreme Court
Decided September 2, 1915No. 2777PublishedCited by 6 opinions
Appeal from District Court, Third District; Hon. M. L. Ritchie, Judge. Action by T. F. Thomas, doing business as the Publishers of the Orpheum Theater Program, against the Clayton Piano Company. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtFrick, J.
The plaintiff, T. F. Thomas, doing business under the firm name and style of the “Publishers of the Orpheum Theater *92Program,” sued the defendant corporation to recover upon the following contract:
“Salt Lake City, Utah, April 23, 1913.
“To the Publishers of the Orpheum Theater Program: You are hereby authorized to publish our advertisement in the Orpheum Theater Program for three months ’ actual play, beginning opening of theater, 1913, .to occupy a space of two center pages, for which we agree to pay the sum of ($75) seventy-five and no/100 dollars per month for the insertion thereof, payable…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gibbons v. BenteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- W. R. Danforth & Co. v. WalkerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1864
- Moline Scale Co. v. BeedSupreme Court of Iowa · 1879
- Davis v. BronsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1891
- William E. Peck & Co. v. Kansas City Metal Roofing & Corrugating Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1902
3Cited by6 opinions
- Richardson v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Piper v. HatchUtah Supreme Court · 1935
- Roberson v. BondurantNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1937
- Tanner v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 1917
- Craig v. HigginsWyoming Supreme Court · 1924
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.