Legal Opinion

Tanner v. Johnson

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1917No. 2992PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Third District; Hon. Geo. G. Armstrong, Judge. Action by J. J. Tanner against Henry Johnson. From a judgment of nonsuit and from an order denying his motion for a new trial, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtCorfman, J.

Plaintiff brought this action against the defendant in the district court of Tooele county to recover damages alleged to have been sustained because of the renunciation of an oral ex-ecutory agreement; Briefly stated, the complaint alleges that an agreement was entered into between the plaintiff and the defendant whereby the defendant employed the plaintiff to thresh the grain raised upon defendant’s farm for the season of 1915; that the grain was to be threshed on or about October *241, 1915, in consideration of which the defendant was to pay to plaintiff a reasonable toll of 8% bushels for each…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. W. R. Danforth & Co. v. WalkerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1864
  2. Moline Scale Co. v. BeedSupreme Court of Iowa · 1879
  3. Davis v. BronsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Thomas v. Clayton Piano Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Holland-Cook Mfg. Co. v. Consolidated Wagon & Machine Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Stewart v. HansenUtah Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Stewart v. HansenUtah Supreme Court · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API