Legal Opinion

Craig v. Higgins

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1924No. 1103Published

1Opinion of the Court

Kimball, Justice.

This is a proceeding in error to review a judgment in favor of the defendant in error (plaintiff below) in an action to recover for the drilling of two oil wells, and to foreclose a lien claimed under the provisions of Chapter 128 of the session laws of 1919, now sections 4830 to 4839, of the Compiled Statutes of 1920.

The only contention is that the verdict and judgment are not sustained by sufficient evidence.

It is argued that the notice of lien was invalid because it did not recite that the work was done under a contract “with the owner, part-owner or lessee” or “the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Osborn v. LogusOregon Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Gibbons v. BenteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  3. Osage Oil & Refining Co. v. Lee Farm Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  4. Sorg v. CrandallIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Davies Henderson Lumber Co. v. GottschalkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API