Legal Opinion

Kolich v. Travelers Insurance

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 6, 1941No. 35,218PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Allen, J.:

Plaintiff brings this action to recover benefits alleged to be due her as the beneficiary of her deceased husband under a policy of group insurance. Defendant filed an answer to the amended petition and thereafter plaintiff filed a reply. Defendant filed a demurrer to the reply. This appeal is from the order of the trial court overruling the demurrer.

The question presented requires an examination of the issues raised by the pleadings.

The amended petition alleged that the defendant company—

“Did on the 1st day of February, 1936, issue to the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Boseman v. Connecticut General Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Carruth v. Ætna Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
  3. Johnson v. State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1898
  4. Union Casualty & Surety Co. v. BraggSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901
  5. Hunter Milling Co. v. AllenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Simms v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1984
  2. Bailey v. Mosby Hotel Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1945
  3. Taylor v. HostetlerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960
  4. Dalton v. HillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1950
  5. Lanning v. GoldsberrySupreme Court of Kansas · 1952

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API