Legal Opinion

Hunter Milling Co. v. Allen

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 8, 1906No. 14,387; No. 14,701PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Errors from Sumner district court; Carroll L. Swarts, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The; opinion of the court was delivered by

BURCH, J.:

The principal question in this case is ' whether the reply departs from the petition. The petition charged that the plaintiff deposited hard and soft wheat in the defendant’s elevator, there to be stored and kept in separate bins and returned on demand; that immediately upon receiving it, however, the de- • fendant mixed the wheat with other grain, removed it ‘ from the elevator to defendant’s mill,' there manufactured it into flour, and then sold the flour as its own. Part of the deposit was accounted for. Unavailing demand was made for the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In re the Disbarment of BurnetteSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  2. Lamme v. DodsonMontana Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Johnson v. State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1898
  4. Union Casualty & Surety Co. v. BraggSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901
  5. Cox v. HayesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  2. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. OwensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  3. Home State Bank v. School District No. 17Supreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  4. Armstrong v. LoughSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
  5. Kolich v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API