Carruth v. Ætna Life Insurance
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Husserl, 0. J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) In considering the general demurrer the first question presented is whether *616this plaintiff can maintain the action, and the answer to this question must depend upon the relation of Ethel Harmon, the plaintiff’s decedent, to the contract. We will first review the nature of the contract. In brief, it is an agreement on the part of the .¿Etna Life Insurance Company, for a named consideration, to insure for one year a group of employees working in the mills of the Lanett Cotton Mills, whose identity is to be determined by the possession of one of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Mobile Fire Department Insurance v. Coleman & CollatSupreme Court of Georgia · 1877
3Cited by44 opinions
- Board of Insurance Commissioners v. Great Southern Life InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1951
- Wann v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1931
- Cherokee Credit Life Insurance v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
- MUTUAL BENEFIT HEALTH & A. ASS'N OF OMAHA v. BullardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
- Ætna Life Insurance v. PadgettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.