Singh v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
PROCEEDING in Prohibition to restrain and prohibit the Superior Court of Glenn County and William M. Finch, Judge thereof, from hearing, proceeding with and deciding any matter in connection with a certain indictment. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
The petition asked for a writ of prohibition restraining and prohibiting respondents from hearing, proceeding with, and deciding any matter in relation to a cer tain indictment returned by the grand jury of Glenn County against petitioner.
The charging part of said indictment reads as follows: “The said Channan Singh . . . did then and there willfully, unlawfully and feloniously and corruptly, offer and give a bribe, to wit: Five hundred dollars, in currency, lawful money of the United States, to one H. W. McGowan, who was then and there, and on the 6th day of Jan., 1919, and ever since said…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Reclamation District No. 1500 v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- County of San Mateo v. CoburnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- People ex rel. Graves v. McFaddenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- County of Sacramento v. ChambersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
- Dillwood v. RiecksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- People v. HallnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Pearson v. ReedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- County of Los Angeles v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- County of Marin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Pitchess v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.