Legal Opinion

Dillwood v. Riecks

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 11, 1919No. Civ. No. 2010PublishedCited by 27 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.

This is an action to recover damages for the loss of plaintiff’s horse, alleged to have perished by fire, on June 14, 1916, through the negligence of defendants. The defendants, other than defendant Quail, are sued as members of the board of supervisors of San Joaquin County and as individuals. Defendant Quail is sued as county surveyor and in his individual capacity. It is alleged in the amended complaint that plaintiff is the owner of a stallion named “Ishmael” of the value of five thousand dollars; that on the day above mentioned and some time prior thereto plaintiff “had kept said…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Reclamation District No. 1500 v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Chafor v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Hover v. BarkhoofCommission of Appeals · 1870
  4. County of San Mateo v. CoburnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Doeg v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Morgan v. County of YubaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  3. County of Marin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Brown v. RuffenachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Griffin v. County of ColusaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API