Legal Opinion

McKay v. Retail Automobile Salesmen's Local Union No. 1067

California Supreme Court

Decided October 14, 1940No. S. F. 16016PublishedCited by 115 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

The question presented for determination in this case concerns the right of labor to picket an employer's place of business. The controversy arose over a demand upon the employer to sign a contract with a union.

*315By a suit against the employer, the American Federation of Labor and a number of its affiliates, Retail Automobile Salesmen’s Local Union No. 1067 and its affiliate, Retail Clerks International Protective Association, Garage Employees Union Local No. 665 and its affiliate, Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Stablemen and Helpers of America, San Francisco Labor Council, and a number…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Thornhill v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Senn v. Tile Layers Protective UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. Vegelahn v. GuntnerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896
  4. J. F. Parkinson Co. v. Building Trades CouncilCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Fenske Bros. v. Upholsterers International Union of North America, Local No. 18Illinois Supreme Court · 1934

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by115 opinions

  1. Boris Levitt v. Yelp! Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  2. Bodinson Manufacturing Co. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. In Re BellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. James v. Marinship Corp.California Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Imperial Ice Co. v. RossierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941

110 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API