Legal Opinion

Branch v. Wiseman

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1875PublishedCited by 16 opinions

From the Hamilton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBiddle, C. J.

Replevin by appellant against the appellee for forty-three hogs. A demurrer was overruled to the complaint, and exception taken, but it is so plainly good that *2we need not notice it further or more particularly. The property was replevied and delivered to the appellant. The appellee answered by a general denial.

A trial by jury was had, and a verdict rendered in the following words:

“We, the jury, find for the defendant, and that the property levied upon by him was of the value of forty-one dollars, and that he is damaged in the sum of twenty-five dollars.”

Proper motions, exceptions, and appeal…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Walsh v. AdamsNew York Supreme Court · 1846
  2. Kennedy v. ShawIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  3. White v. JonesIllinois Supreme Court · 1865
  4. Bernal v. HoviousCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
  5. Davis v. WarfieldIndiana Supreme Court · 1872

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Sims v. JonesNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Aultman & Co. v. ForgeyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894
  3. Oester v. SitlingtonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  4. Guaranty Discount Corp. v. BowersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1927
  5. Stumph v. BauerIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API