Legal Opinion

Daniel v. O'Neill

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided January 31, 1990No. 88-471PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThayer, J.

The plaintiffs, Daniel and Susan Leach, appeal an order of the Superior Court (Dalianis, J.) granting them interest on an arbitration award only from the date of the arbitration decision, and not from the date they filed their writ. The plaintiffs allege that under RSA 524:1-b they are entitled to interest from the date they initiated suit in superior court. For the reasons stated below, we affirm the trial court’s order.

The record reveals that on January 1, 1986, the plaintiffs and the defendant, Robert J. O’Neill, Jr., were involved in an automobile accident while they were traveling in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hackman v. American Mutual Liability InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1970
  2. Ellis v. Royal InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
  3. In re Robyn W.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
  4. Andrews v. FosterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1861
  5. Chapin v. BoodySuperior Court of New Hampshire · 1852

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Great Lakes Aircraft Co. v. City of ClaremontSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
  2. Arbitration Between Kalawaia v. AIG Hawai'i Insurance Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  3. McClary v. Erie Engine & Manufacturing Co.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1994
  4. Ebasco Constructors, Inc. v. Ahtna, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1997
  5. STATE DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS v. Fluor Daniel, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API