Legal Opinion
Ellis v. Royal Insurance
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided May 28, 1987No. 85-554PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrock, C.J.
This appeal arises out of two consolidated cases and involves issues of choice of law, the applicability of RSA 264:15,1, to an insurance policy neither issued nor delivered in this State, primary versus excess insurance coverage, allocation of a credit for insurance coverage available from a tortfeasor, and the permissibility of awarding Valerie G. Ellis (Ellis) attorney’s fees, costs, and interest. We affirm in part, modify in part, and reverse in part.
On November 13, 1982, Ellis, a Purolator Courier (Purolator) employee acting within the scope of her employment, was driving a truck owned…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Baybutt Construction Corp. v. Commercial Union InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
- Trombly v. Blue Cross/Blue ShieldSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
- In Re Russell C.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
- Hackman v. American Mutual Liability InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1970
- Consolidated Mutual Insurance v. Radio Foods Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1968
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. SchillingSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Nile v. NileMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
- Glowski v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
- Fireman's Fund Insurance v. CNA InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
- Rothwell v. Chubb Life Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1998
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.