Legal Opinion

Ebasco Constructors, Inc. v. Ahtna, Inc.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1997No. S-7476PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MATTHEWS, Justice.

This is an appeal of the superior court’s confirmation of an arbitration proceeding and of its decision to add prejudgment interest to the arbitrator’s award. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

I. FACTS & PROCEEDINGS

The arbitration proceeding at issue involved a dispute concerning a joint venture agreement (“JVA”) between Ahtna and En-serch, a predecessor to Ebasco Constructors, Inc. (Ebasco). The JVA was formed as part of an effort by Ebasco to win a subcontract with General Electric Company for work on an Air Force project. The project eventually was canceled.…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Gordon Sel-Way, Inc. v. Spence Bros.Michigan Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. PhillipsAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Langdon v. ChampionAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Farnsworth v. SteinerAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Paola v. Commercial Union Assurance CompaniesSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1983

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Pike v. FreemanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
  2. Arbitration Between Kalawaia v. AIG Hawai'i Insurance Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Marathon Oil Co. v. ARCO Alaska, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1999
  4. STATE DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS v. Fluor Daniel, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Department of Corrections v. Fluor Daniel, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API