Legal Opinion

McClary v. Erie Engine & Manufacturing Co.

District Court, D. New Hampshire

Decided May 19, 1994No. Civ. 93-541-SDPublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER.

DEVINE, Senior District Judge.

In this products liability action, plaintiff James A. McClary seeks to recover damages for personal injuries he allegedly suffered while operating a “rubber roller mill”, Serial No. 69-1873, that was manufactured and distributed by defendant Erie Engine & Manufacturing Company (EEMCO) in 1969 while it was a wholly-owned subsidiary of defendant Zurn Industries, Inc. Defendant ASB Industries, Inc., is allegedly liable for plaintiffs injuries under the doctrine of successor liability.

Presently before the court is defendant ASB’s motion to dismiss for lack of…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Arthur F. Sawtelle, Etc. v. George E. FarrellCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
  2. Dagesse v. Plant Hotel N.V.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2000
  3. Anderson v. Century Products Co.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1996
  4. Patrick v. Massachusetts Port AuthorityDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2001
  5. Pelchat v. Sterilite Corp.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1996

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API