Legal Opinion
Slack v. James
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Decided October 27, 2003No. 3686PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGoolsby, J.
Mary and Stephen Slack (“Sellers”) filed a complaint against Lonnie and Shannon James (“Buyers”) concerning a real estate contract. Buyers appeal from the circuit court’s order dismissing and striking their counterclaims. We reverse and remand.
FACTS
When we view the facts as alleged in the pleadings in the light most favorable to the Buyers, the pleadings show Sellers and Buyers, each represented by real estate agents, entered into a written contract for the sale of Sellers’ home for $1,208,000.00. The sales contract includes the following provisions, which we quote only in part:
14.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Stiles v. OnoratoSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
- Gentry v. YonceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
- Aaron v. Hampton Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1962
- MacFarlane v. ManlySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
- Reid v. Harbison Development CorporationCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Slack v. JamesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
- RoTec Services, Inc. v. Encompass Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. S.B. Phillips Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2005
- Moseley v. All Things Possible, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
- LoPresti v. BurryCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.