Legal Opinion

MacFarlane v. Manly

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 31, 1980No. 21179PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Littlejohn, Justice:

This action was commenced by Jack MacFarlane and Merle Irene C. MacFarlane (buyers) against Pauline N. Manly and J. Bonner Manly (sellers) for fraud in the sale of a house and lot by reason of failure to disclose termite and water damage. Motion was made by the sellers for summary judgment on the grounds that the buyers “. . . had knowledge of the alleged defects at the time of purchase, and further that Defendants (sellers) as a matter of law had no duty to disclose any matters to the Plaintiffs.” The motion was granted. The buyers have appealed. We reverse.

The relevant…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rutledge v. DodenhoffSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1970
  2. Lawson v. Citizens & Southern National Bank Ex Rel. Will of ClevelandSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1972
  3. Rogers v. ScyphersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1968
  4. Abrams v. WrightSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1974
  5. Cohen v. BlessingSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1972

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Silva v. StevensSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
  2. Stemple v. DobsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Murphy v. HaganSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
  4. Jackson v. Swordfish Investments, L.L.C.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
  5. Laurens Emergency Medical Specialists, PA v. M.S. Bailey & Sons BankersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API