MacFarlane v. Manly
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Littlejohn, Justice:
This action was commenced by Jack MacFarlane and Merle Irene C. MacFarlane (buyers) against Pauline N. Manly and J. Bonner Manly (sellers) for fraud in the sale of a house and lot by reason of failure to disclose termite and water damage. Motion was made by the sellers for summary judgment on the grounds that the buyers “. . . had knowledge of the alleged defects at the time of purchase, and further that Defendants (sellers) as a matter of law had no duty to disclose any matters to the Plaintiffs.” The motion was granted. The buyers have appealed. We reverse.
The relevant…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Rutledge v. DodenhoffSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1970
- Lawson v. Citizens & Southern National Bank Ex Rel. Will of ClevelandSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1972
- Rogers v. ScyphersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1968
- Abrams v. WrightSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1974
- Cohen v. BlessingSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1972
3Cited by19 opinions
- Silva v. StevensSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
- Stemple v. DobsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1990
- Murphy v. HaganSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
- Jackson v. Swordfish Investments, L.L.C.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
- Laurens Emergency Medical Specialists, PA v. M.S. Bailey & Sons BankersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.