Legal Opinion

Moseley v. All Things Possible, Inc.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided December 12, 2011No. 27074PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kittredge

We granted a writ of certiorari to review the court of appeals’ decision affirming the trial court judgment against Petitioner All Things Possible, Inc., for fraud in connection with a real estate transaction case, where the truth was discoverable in the public records. Moseley v. All Things Possible, Inc., 388 S.C. 31, 694 S.E.2d 43 (Ct.App.2010). We affirm.

I

Petitioner All Things Possible, Inc., (ATP) sold an undeveloped lot in the Secret Cove subdivision, located in Lexington County, to Respondents Michael and Marsha Moseley. The lot is burdened by an underground, surface-water drainage…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  2. Conner v. City of Forest AcresSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  3. Turner v. MillimanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  4. Temple v. Tec-Fab, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
  5. Slack v. JamesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Anthony v. Atlantic Group, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2012
  2. Abbeville County School District v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014
  3. Marcantel v. Michael & Sonja Saltman FamilyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2021
  4. Brabham Oil Company, Inc. v. Fuel Trader Supply, LLC, Blue Earth Resources, Inc., Fuel Trader Resource Management, Inc., William R. Eaton, Scott M. Boruff, Charles B Lobetti, III, Gary W. Ford, Jr.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API