Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Schweinhagen v. Underhill
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided February 17, 1943No. 29332PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTurner, J.
The relators claim that:
“ (1) The resolution, alleged to have been passed in September, 1941-, is not sufficient to authorize the holding of an election on centralization at a primary election.
“(2) The Board of Education of North RichlandAdams Rural School District, having proceeded under Section 7730 to establish an actual centralized school in the district, the schools were in fact centralized. The schools being in fact centralized, the boaid is not authorized to submit a moot question to the electors.
• “(3) The petitions to transfer being signed by 100 per cent of the resident electors, it…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Armstrong v. DaveyOhio Supreme Court · 1935
- State Ex Rel. Darby v. HadawayOhio Supreme Court · 1925
- State Ex Rel. Automobile MacHine Co. v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1929
- State Ex Rel. Apple v. PenceOhio Supreme Court · 1941
- Bd. of Edn. v. State, Ex Rel.Ohio Supreme Court · 1926
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- City of Cleveland v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- Wadsworth v. DambachOhio Court of Appeals · 1954
- Adamski v. B.U.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1959