Adamski v. B.U.C.

The simple but exceedingly difficult problem confronting us is whether the two plants of the employer, one in Toledo and the other 60 miles away in the Detroit area, constitute a “factory, establishment or other premises” within the purport and meaning of the phrase as employed in Section 4141.29(C), Revised Code.

As has been cogently remarked: '“The relative recency of the [unemployment compensation] law and the paucity of judicial decisions thereon create historical nuances rather than historical facts, which are of only small import in a historical interpretation of the true purpose of the…