Legal Opinion
Hales v. Snowden
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 26, 1937No. Civ. S. C. 44PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WHITE, J., pro tem.
This is an action for the foreclosure of three purchase-money mortgages, executed in April, 1927, by defendants Snowden and by defendants and appellants Colyear, in the total amount of $21,000, upon which $1,000 had been paid at the time of trial. The complaint tendered three causes of action. Judgment went for plaintiff in the amount claimed to be due; and also ordered a sale of the mortgaged premises and directed execution to issue against the defendants for any deficiency.
Three grounds are urged by appellants for reversal of the judgment herein: (1) that the court erred…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Bank of Columbia v. OkelySupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Von Hoffman v. City of QuincySupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Edwards v. KearzeySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- W. B. Worthen Co. v. KavanaughSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Sonoma County Organization of Public Employees v. County of SonomaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Baugh v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Stockton Savings & Loan Bank v. MassanetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Webster v. Board of Dental ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Fernelius v. PierceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.