Legal Opinion

Fernelius v. Pierce

California Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1943No. S. F. 16768PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.

This case squarely presents the question as to whether public officials are liable in damages for injuries proximately resulting from their negligent failure to suspend or discharge known unfit and vicious subordinates, the officials having notice of the subordinates’ unfitness and viciousness and having the power to suspend and remove them subject, however, to review by a civil service board. We conclude that the power to suspend or discharge the subordinates from duty and to start proceedings for their removal from civil service lists carries with it the correlative duty to vigilantly…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Perkins v. BlauthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Michel v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Strickfaden v. Greencreek Highway DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Brown v. FerdonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Doeg v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Stone v. Arizona Highway CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Melvin Carter v. John R. CarlsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
  3. Baugh v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. DuBree v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Garcia v. DuffyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API