Legal Opinion

Bakersfield Home Building Co. v. J. K. McAlpine Land & Development Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 19, 1938No. Civ. 1896PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAINES, J., pro tem.

The complaint in this action alleges the execution by defendant to plaintiff of a promissory note dated October 28, 1930, for $2,500 with interest, payable at the rate of $50 per month, including interest, commencing November 28, 1930, also the coincident execution by defendant to secure the note of a deed of trust affecting certain real property in Kern County to Bank of America of California, a corporation, as trustee for plaintiff’s benefit. It is further alleged that prior to February 9, 1936, no part of said indebtedness had been paid except the interest to August 15,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Terry v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Doehla v. PhillipsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Alferitz v. BorgwardtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Mersfelder v. SpringCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Swamp Land District No. 307 v. GlideCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Chavez v. SargentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Birkhofer v. KrummCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  3. Ware v. HellerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  4. Chapman v. AggelerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  5. Massey-Ferguson Credit Corp. v. CasaulongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API