Legal Opinion

Ware v. Heller

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 18, 1944No. Civ. 13901PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BISHOP, J. pro tem.

In this action to recover a deficiency judgment after a sale under a trust deed, the plaintiff sought and obtained a summary judgment, from which the defendants have appealed. A demurrer had been sustained, without leave to amend, to several affirmative defenses which set up statutes of limitations, and that ruling is one of the subjects to engage our attention. So also is defendants’ contention that the judgment should have been limited, under the provisions of section 580a, Code of Civil Procedure, to the difference between the value of the property at the time of sale…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Gelfert v. National City Bank of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Richmond Mortgage & Loan Corp. v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. Morris v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Birkhofer v. KrummCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  5. American States Water Service Co. v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Droeger v. Friedman, Sloan & RossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Holloway v. BarrettNevada Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Holt v. MorganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. Engen v. JamesIdaho Supreme Court · 1969

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API