Legal Opinion

Alferitz v. Borgwardt

California Supreme Court

Decided September 26, 1899No. L.A. No. 527PublishedCited by 27 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtTemple, J.

—This is an appeal from a judgment entered upon a general demurrer to plaintiffs complaint, and upon his refusal to amend.

In the complaint it is averred that on the seventeenth day of November, 1893, one F. B. Dagany executed and delivered to plaintiff his promissory note for nine thousand dollars, with interest, due six months after date, and, to secure payment of the same, gave him a chattel mortgage, executed and recorded as required by law, upon “five thousand five hundred sheep and the increase thereof, said eighteen horses and the increase thereof, and twenty-four head of neat cattle…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Douglass v. County of PikeSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Hart v. BurnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  3. Berson v. NunanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Shoobert v. De MottaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Cabrera v. City of Huntington ParkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  2. People v. HallnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Los Angeles County Pioneer Society v. Historical SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Fluor Corporation v. Super. Ct.California Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Falconer v. SimmonsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1902

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API