Legal Opinion

Swamp Land District No. 307 v. Glide

California Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1896No. Sac. No. 5PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Yolo County and from an order denying a new trial. W. H. Grant, Judge. The facts are stated, in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

Appeals from the judgment and from the order denying a new trial.

The commissioners of the plaintiff Swamp Land District in 1889 made their assessment under the reclamation act. The list was filed with the county treasurer April 5, 1889. The defendant refused to pay certain installments upon his assessment, and this action was brought charging upon the installments in separate counts and seeking to collect the same.

Section 3466 of the Political Code, as amended in 1880, was the law in force at the time of the assessment, and at the time when the charges therein became a lien upon the land.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sohn v. WatersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. Vance v. VanceSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  3. Wheeler v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. Bender v. CrawfordTexas Supreme Court · 1871
  5. Henry v. ThorpeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1848

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Mudd v. McColganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Doehla v. PhillipsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Davis & McMillan v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Steinbauer v. BondesenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  5. Cal. Safe Deposit & Tr. Co. v. Sierra Valleys Ry.California Supreme Court · 1910

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API