Legal Opinion

United States v. Furuya

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 11, 1923No. 2221; No. 2222PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBland, Judge

These two cases involve the same class of merchandise, and all of the protests involved in the two suits are admitted to cover the same-class of merchandise. The cases have been consolidated, and the determination of the classification under one of the protests will determine the classification under the others.

The Board of General Appraisers seems to have attached much importance to the stipulation by the Government’s counsel that the merchandise in controversy in these suits was identical with the merchandise in controversy in the case of George S. Bush & Co. (Abstract 43278, 37 Treas. Dec.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. OberleCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  2. United States v. Johns-Manville Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Carl Matusek Shipping Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1963
  2. Protest 71634-K of GreeneUnited States Customs Court · 1944
  3. R. U. Delapenha & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API